Teamsters Local 731 Labor Management Cooperation Committee
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 364399384
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Burr Ridge, IL, USA
- Phone
- 6308874100
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Labor Unions
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,079,912
- Expenses
- $1,294,165
- Assets
- $739,185
- Liabilities
- $5,798
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
People named in this filing
- MICHAEL HAFFNER (TRUSTEE)
- DAVID N SNELTEN (TRUSTEE)
- DANIEL R PLOTE (TRUSTEE)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To improve communicatons between representatives of labor and management in order to provide a forum for discussion of matters of mutual interest; to provide opportunities to study and explore new approaches to achieving organizatiional effectiveness, to assist in solving problems of mutual concern not susceptible to resolution in the collective bargaining process, to study and explore ways of eliminating problems which reduce the competitiveness and inhibit development of the industry in which employers operate, to enhance opportunities for workers employed as owner operators covered by collective bargaining agreements, to find ways to monitor and preserve industry standards regarding wages and fringe benefits, to expand and improve working relationships between employees, owner/operators and employers, to encourage free collective bargaining, to identify snd expand work opportunities for employees and employers and to obtain governmental and philanthropic assistance for work recovery
What it reported doing in 2025
To improve communicatons between representatives of labor and management in order to provide a forum for discussion of matters of mutual interest; to provide opportunities to study and explore new approaches to achieving organizatiional effectiveness, to assist in solving problems of mutual concern not susceptible to resolution in the collective bargaining process, to study and explore ways of eliminating problems which reduce the competitiveness and inhibit development of the industry in which employers operate, to enhance opportunities for workers employed as owner operators covered by collective bargaining agreements, to find ways to monitor and preserve industry standards regarding wages and fringe benefits, to expand and improve working relationships between employees, owner/operators and employers, to encourage free collective bargaining, to identify and expand work opportunities for employees and employers and to obtain governmental and philanthropic assistance for work recovery
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 98% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 76
- Sustainability: 28
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -19.8%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.57; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 2.7% per year; rating input score 100; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -0% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 4 of 4 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 12 of 12 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2013 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 7 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 7/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 28/100.