Teamsters Local 142 Stewards Council

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
352113717
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Gary, IN, USA
Phone
2199491550
Rating
53
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Labor Unions

Reported finances

Revenue
$22,454
Expenses
$33,926
Assets
$7,353
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

People named in this filing

  • LARRY HARKER (TRUSTEE - PAST)
  • MATTHEW ALEXANDER (CHAIRMAN)
  • EDWARD SWELFER (VICE CHAIRMAN - PAST)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Stewards council

What it reported doing in 2024

To form a united front for the preservation of the ideals of trade unionism among the local's members and the community. To protect, preserve and improve the social and economic status of the members; to create a closer fellowship among teamster members; to safeguard, advance and promote the interest of teamsters by organizational, educational and other community activities; to engage in cultural, civic, legislative, fraternal, educational, charitable, welfare, social and other activities which further the interests of this organization and its membership, directly or indirectly; to receive, manage, invest, expand or otherwise use the funds and property of this organization to carry out the duties and to achieve its objectives; and for additional purposes and objectives consistent therewith as will further the interests of this organization and its members, directly or indirectly. To carry out activities which will stimulate the interest and participation of local 142 members in the trade union movement and particularly in the affairs of local 142.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 67% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 37
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 26
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 58.8%; rating input score 59
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -51.1%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.22; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -6.9% per year; rating input score 0; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -3.4% per year; rating input score 0; 28th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 58.8% of revenue deployed
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 59/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 13/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 17/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.