Team Utah Snowboarding Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
270733209
IRS 990 coverage
2013–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2012
Location
Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Phone
8016732158
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Winter Sports

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$0
Expenses
$4,007
Assets
$12,569
Liabilities
$35,405

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

1 person listed

People named in this filing

  • LANE CLEGG (PROGRAM DIRE)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Our current mission is: to provide access to progression, promote active healthy lifestyles, and facilitate lifetime participation in mountain sports 1.provided competitive level coaching programs for 117 athlete members, ranging from intro to comp through world cup levels, including both able bodied and adaptive athletes. 2.provided travel services for competitive snowboarding, mountain biking, and freeski athletes for training and competitions across the united states and canada, south america, europe, and asia. (summer and winter travel for training and competitions expenses) 3.provided portfolio development services to aspiring professionals within the snowboarding, mountain biking and freeskiing industries.

What it reported doing in 2024

2.provided travel services for competitive snowboard athletes for training and competitions across the united states and canada, south america, europe, and asia. (summer and winter travel for training and competitions expenses)

Operating model

Revenue model
No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 39
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 64
  • Sustainability: 19
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 51.7%; rating input score 52
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.14; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 2.82; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -27.8% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -7.8% per year; rating input score 0; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -4% per year; rating input score 0; 23rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 51.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 4 of 4 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $2K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 1 people listed
  • Consistency: 14 of 14 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2013 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 52/100.
  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 41/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.