Team Joyner Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 473747973
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2022
- Location
- Annandale, VA, USA
- Rating
- 64
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Scholarships, Student Financial Aid Services, Awards
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $74,638
- Expenses
- $14,261
- Assets
- $338,099
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Nancy D Joyner (President)
- Kristin Joyner (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Nancy D Joyner (President)
- Kristin Joyner (Vice President)
- Timothy C Harris (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Team Joyner Foundation provides scholarships to needy high school seniors to attend community college. It is dedicated to the memory of Clayton Coach CJ Joyner a former high school head coach of the school swim dive team and adjunct instructor of physical education at Northern Virginia Community College. Team Joyner Foundation is an all volunteer non profit organization. There are no paid staff members.
What it reported doing in 2024
Seven scholarships and grants were awarded to needy high school seniors. Team Joyner Foundation works in conjunction with Northern Virginia Community College to encourage needy high school seniors to pursue post secondary education.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 75% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 48
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 80
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 24.4%; rating input score 24
- Program expense ratio: 87%; rating input score 87
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 80.9%; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 23.71; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 17.6% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 23.7% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 24.4% of revenue deployed · 87% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $12K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 24/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.