Team Fort Collins Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
841501128
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2019–2019
Forms available
Form 990 2018, Form 990-EZ 2019
Location
Fort Collins, CO, USA
Phone
9702249931
Rating
88
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Counseling, Support Groups

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$163,805
Expenses
$132,835
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • STEPHEN G ACKERMAN (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • ADAM MUSIELEWICZ (INTERIM EXEC)
  • LYNN OESTERLE ZOLLNER (INTERIM EXEC)
  • STEPHEN G ACKERMAN (PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Team wellness and prevention promotes healthy lifestyles through substance abuse prevention.

What it reported doing in 2019

Spf-pfs team loveland program focuses on prevention in thompson school district which aims to reduce substance misuse and strengthen prevention capacity. Pfs programs provide eligible states and jurisdictions with funds to achieve quantifiable declines in rates of substance misuse. Pfs programs address gaps in prevention services and increase states' abilities to assist high-need communities with emerging problems related to substance use and misuse. Pfs programs help leverage, redirect, and realign state- wide funding streams for prevention. Pfs is based on the premise that changes at the community level will lead to measurable changes at the state level. States and their pfs-funded communities of high need can effectively overcome challenges associated with substance misuse.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 82% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Assets have declined or grown slowly and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 88
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 37
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 80.8%; rating input score 81
  • Program expense ratio: 99.7%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 18.9%; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 30.8%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 2.6% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -11.9% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 80.8% of revenue deployed · 99.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $132K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 12/100.