Team Footworks Educational & Fitness Corporation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 650455073
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- South Miami, FL, USA
- Phone
- 3056667223
- Rating
- 39
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Amateur Sports
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,911,451
- Expenses
- $3,022,472
- Assets
- $343,755
- Liabilities
- $188,835
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LAURIE HUSEBY (PRESIDENT/SEC/DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- MARIA I SENTMANAT (DIRECTOR): $153,500 total reported compensation
- LAURIE HUSEBY (PRESIDENT/SEC/DIRECTOR): $142,500 total reported compensation
- JONATHAN MALONE (DIRECTOR): $135,500 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Their mission in their detailed statement describes their constant desire to train others to maintain good health thru their listed programs.the widely publicized and organized race events will educate and illustrate to both individuals and groups the benefits of having a physically fit and active lifestyle which is achieved through a regular program of jogging, running or walking. The activities include both physical participation in the race events in addition to attending clinics and programs and reading various mailouts and publications issued and distributed by this organization.
What it reported doing in 2025
Key club house of south Florida "see statement schedule i"
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 76% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 5
- Transparency & Controls: 72
- Accountability: 56
- Sustainability: 13
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 5.3%; rating input score 5
- Program expense ratio: 5.1%; rating input score 5
- Fundraising efficiency: $0.44 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 80%; rating input score 80; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 22
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -3.8%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.11; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.55; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 17.3%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 23.8% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 19% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -3.9% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 5.3% of revenue deployed · 5.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 5 board members independent · 2 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $155K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $154K · 5 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 27 of 28 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2020 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 16 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 12 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 5/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 5/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 8 not reported.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 1/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 17/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 4/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 14/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 19/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.