Teach All Nations Mission Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
364495457
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2012–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Colorado Springs, CO, USA
Phone
7196859999
Rating
88
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Christianity
Affiliation
Christianity

Reported finances

Revenue
$182,628
Expenses
$163,011
Assets
$202,632
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • R DELRON SHIRLEY (PRESIDENT)
  • MARGARET ANN SHIRLEY (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • R DELRON SHIRLEY (PRESIDENT)
  • MARGARET ANN SHIRLEY (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • LINDA EASTON (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Teach all nations mission, inc purpose will be related to the publication and distribution of christian literature. Teach all nations mission, inc will also focus on christian education, involving the provision of scholarships for students in training for christian ministry and ministry related fields, establishing and supporting schools and training centers both in the united states and abroad, and funding grant programs for christian missionaries, teachers, and schools. Teach all nations mission, inc will also support charitable humanitarian operations, such as funding children's homes, feeding centers, refugee programs, emergency and disaster relief agencies, and rehabilitation operations.

What it reported doing in 2025

Various contributions made to help support missionaries around the world, particularly in africa, dominican republic, and germany. Included are contributions made to organizations that assist in the treatment of drug, alcohol, pornography addictions, and feeding the hungry.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 97% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 80
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 62
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 76.8%; rating input score 77
  • Program expense ratio: 85.9%; rating input score 86

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 10.7%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.24; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 2.4% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.7% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 12.1% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 76.8% of revenue deployed · 85.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $140K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2012 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 57/100.