Tbx4life
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 874583041
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2023
- Location
- Nashville, TN, USA
- Phone
- 6153898176
- Rating
- 71
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Birth Defects and Genetic Diseases
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $98,330
- Expenses
- $6,987
- Assets
- $114,513
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Anton Morkin (CEO)
- Dr Eric Austin (President and Scientific Lead)
People named in this filing
- Anton Morkin (CEO)
- Dr Eric Austin (President and Scientific Lead)
- LaRae Hacker (Treasurer, Director of Communications)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Nonprofit dedicated to raising awareness about TBX4 Syndrome, supporting families affected by this ultra? rare genetic disorder, and accelerating international medical research toward a cure
What it reported doing in 2024
Community Fundraising Event ? Cure TBX4 Charity Golf Tournament On November 12, 2024, TBX4Life hosted its first annual charity golf tournament to raise awareness and funds. It took place at Catta Verdera Country Club, with 18 holes, group play, catering, and an awards dinner. The event engaged sponsors and participants to raise approximately USD 78,000. Proceeds will support TBX4Life? s acceleration of research? including funding seed grants and supporting a dedicated TBX4 infrastructure ? and intensifying awareness outreach worldwide.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 80% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filed totals do not add up.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 54
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 81
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 25.5%; rating input score 26
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 92.9%; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 16.39; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 25.5% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $25K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 7 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 26/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.