Tazewell Today Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
473572273
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2018
Location
Tazewell, VA, USA
Phone
2763851050
Rating
78
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Community, Neighborhood Development

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$146,700
Expenses
$90,861
Assets
$130,185
Liabilities
$1,248

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • EMILY COMBS DAVIS (FMR TREASURER/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • ALICIA BALES (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • NATHAN THOMAS (PRESIDENT)
  • VANESSA A REBENTISCH (FORMER EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

People named in this filing

  • IRMA D MITCHELL (BOARD MEMBER)
  • EMILY COMBS DAVIS (FMR TREASURER/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • ALICIA BALES (VICE PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Tazewell today inc. Is a local initiative to revitalize the tazewell main street community. It is our mission to develop a warm welcoming center that represents the heart of tazewell and attracts residents and tourists alike through shopping, dining, working, and playing opportunities. We strive to nurture and share the natural scenic beauty inherent to our town. We plan to restore and maintain the historic landscape of main street as a local attraction to engender a thriving commercial and civic area for all to enjoy.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 88% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 60
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 68
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 48.7%; rating input score 49
  • Program expense ratio: 78.3%; rating input score 78

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 38.1%; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.43; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 47.7%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 11% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 13.6% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 26.5% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 48.7% of revenue deployed · 78.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $71K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 49/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 5/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 42/100.