Taxpayer Revolution Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 455182223
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2013–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2012
- Location
- San Diego, CA, USA
- Phone
- 8582707507
- Rating
- 54
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Civil Rights
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $14,832
- Expenses
- $14,774
- Assets
- $10,558
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Ted Hilton (President)
- Pete Nunez (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Ted Hilton (President)
- Pete Nunez (Vice President)
- Hisako Yoshida (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Taxpayer Revolution is organized as an educational movement to create awareness of societal problems resulting from drug cartels, transnational gangs and other criminals illegally entering, then evading apprehension. Our organization informs of serious problems resulting from massive migrations which negatively impact taxpayers. We advocate full enforcement of all immigration and border control laws, as well as assistance to welfare recipients, parolees, and any able-bodied worker in finding employment to reduce the number working without permission.
What it reported doing in 2025
Taxpayer Revolution Foundation mailed an average of 525 newsletters per month during 2025. The newsletters are sent to donors and interested parties and help raise awareness of our purpose.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 39
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 39
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 38.9%; rating input score 39
- Program expense ratio: 39.1%; rating input score 39
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0.4%; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.71; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -9.5% per year; rating input score 0; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -14.3% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -0% per year; rating input score 0; 37th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 38.9% of revenue deployed · 39.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $6K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2013 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 39/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 39/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 45/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 39/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.