Tarrant Area Community of Churches

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
756004721
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2018–2019
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2019
Location
Fort Worth, TX, USA
Phone
8177375554
Rating
45
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$108,433
Expenses
$107,726
Assets
$39,823
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Linda Baker (President)
  • Lester Meriwether (Vice President)
  • Lindsay Klatzkin (Executive Director)

People named in this filing

  • Linda Baker (President)
  • Lester Meriwether (Vice President)
  • Beth Barber (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Community Based religious organization with emphasis on community service.

What it reported doing in 2019

Sack Lunch Chuck Wagon - Congregations and groups work together over three weeks during The Fort Worth Stock Show and Rodeo. TCT provides a total of 5,300 sack lunches of non perishable foods for homeless day laborers, enabling them to have a good meal.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 87% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 97% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 10
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 35
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 10.3%; rating input score 10
  • Program expense ratio: 10.4%; rating input score 10

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0.7%; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.37; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 60.8%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 12.3% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 11.1% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 25.9% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 10.3% of revenue deployed · 10.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 5 filed program accomplishments · $11K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2018 to 2019
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 10/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 10/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 35/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 30/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 2/100.