TARGIT Collaborative Group
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 812330581
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990 2022, Form 990-EZ 2023
- Location
- Sacramento, CA, USA
- Phone
- 9163828543
- Rating
- 67
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Professional Societies, Associations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $20,000
- Expenses
- $29,526
- Assets
- $58,857
- Liabilities
- $16,989
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Valery Uhl MD (President)
People named in this filing
- Calma Association Management (Executive Dir.)
- Lisa Bailey MD (Director)
- Valery Uhl MD (President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The TARGIT Collaborative Group (TCG) is a cooperative effort between radiation oncologists, cancer surgeons, physicists and other experts in intraoperative radiotherapy that share a common mission to improve cancer patient care through education, patient advocacy, mentorship, and collaborative research.New technologies and innovations are enabling physicians to provide safe, effective, and less harmful treatments to patients. A major initial focus of the organization will be on increasing physician and patient awareness and access to targeted intraoperative radiotherapy, an innovative cancer treatment thatreduces the side effect and burden of cancer care.TARGit Intraoperative radioTherapy (TARGIT) is a type of accelerated radiation treatment that has been most commonly used in breast cancer to deliver a complete course of radiation to the cancer site during surgery, immediately following cancer removal. In most cases, this single treatment eliminates the need for the usual 4-6 week cou
What it reported doing in 2023
Continued our work on the patient focused website and the Quality Collaborative registry. Still feeling the after affects of COVID, funding from key sources did not materialize, causing us to cancel our annual conference. Developed a membership model that will launch in 2024.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 49
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 27
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 56.4%; rating input score 56
- Program expense ratio: 38.2%; rating input score 38
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -47.6%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.99; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.29; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 76.4%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -172.6% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 11% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 56.4% of revenue deployed · 38.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $11K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 56/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 38/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 14/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 12/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.