Tarc Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 486086732
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-T 2025
- Location
- Topeka, KS, USA
- Phone
- 7852320597
- Rating
- 88
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Developmentally Disabled Centers
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $15,320,194
- Expenses
- $15,230,895
- Assets
- $7,995,153
- Liabilities
- $1,020,835
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
19 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MIKE MUNSON (PAST PRESIDENT)
- JAYME PAINTER (PRESIDENT)
- EILEEN DORAN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (THRU JULY 2025))
- JAMES FLETCHER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (BEGIN JULY 2025))
Highest reported compensation
- LAURA MARPLE (FINANCE DIRECTOR): $129,634 total reported compensation
- JESSICA ABEL (HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR): $123,086 total reported compensation
- SHELBY FRY (DAY & WORK SERVICES DIRECTOR): $119,712 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Tarc, inc. Enhances the lives of people affected by intellectual, developmental, and related disabilities through commitment to excellence in service, support, and advocacy.
What it reported doing in 2025
Community developmental disability organization (cddo) contracts with Kansas department of aging & disability services to provide oversight to all affiliated providers in shawnee county and serves as the single point of entry for intellectual/developmental disability services. 1,327 individuals received services.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 66% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 87
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 32
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 89.5%; rating input score 90
- Program expense ratio: 90%; rating input score 90
- Fundraising efficiency: $29.71 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 88.2%; rating input score 88; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0.6%; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.52; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.13; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 3.7%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 1.7% per year; rating input score 100; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.2% per year; rating input score 100; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 0.5% per year; rating input score 100; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 89.5% of revenue deployed · 90% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 14 of 14 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 8 filed program accomplishments · $13.7M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $130K · 19 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $1.6M reported
- Consistency: 32 of 34 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 27/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 13/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.