Tampa Catholic Bar Association Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
831403417
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2020
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2020
Location
Tampa, FL, USA
Phone
8138775548
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Professional Societies, Associations
Affiliation
Christianity

Reported finances

Expenses
$1,500
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$1,500

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • NADINE S DIAZ (PRESIDENT)
  • KEVIN MOLONY (PRESIDENT EL)

People named in this filing

  • NADINE S DIAZ (PRESIDENT)
  • KEVIN MOLONY (PRESIDENT EL)
  • RONALD D BARCENA JR (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The entity is a non-profit organization of lawyers dedicated to upholding and defending the constitution of the united states and Florida. The primary purpose is to advance the cause of legal education and promote good fellowship and mutual acquaintance for alumni of tampa catholic high school in tampa, Florida. These goals are achieved by providing forums for mentorship, support, and loyalty among legal professionals who started their careers with the education they received at tampa catholic high school. The association will come in the form of religious fellowship, community outreach, professional networking, student training, consultation, and representation. Activities will occur at various locations in the tampa bay area, including tampa catholic high school or various community venues based on function. Only members in good standing with the Florida bar, are of good moral character, have paid the established dues for membership, comply with the criteria contained in the provisio

What it reported doing in 2020

One of the legal education sessions was a power lunch on september 20, 2018 presented by attorney kim kohn on nursing home abuse matters. The session provided the members with useful information as well as time for discussion with peers.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 9
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 3 of 3 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 11/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.