Tamion Enterprises

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
475546943
IRS 990 coverage
2017–2023
Forms available
Form 990 2023
Location
Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Phone
4122467225
Rating
82
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Reported finances

Revenue
$84,957
Expenses
$97,787
Assets
$447,930
Liabilities
$168,895

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CONSTANCE W BALTHROP (PRESIDENT/SE)

People named in this filing

  • CONSTANCE W BALTHROP (PRESIDENT/SE)
  • ARTHUR M BALTHROP III (VICE PRESIDE)
  • DONALD O CLAY JR (BOARD MEMBER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Tamion's mission is to bring spiritual enlightenment, economic stability, and strengthened families to the communities it serves through economic development, job training programs, life skills enrichment programs, and family support services including youth programs, counseling programs, and other community based programs. Tamion enterprises will work in collaboration with community based organizations, agencies, and civic organizations in furtherance of its stated mission.

What it reported doing in 2023

Youth ministry: youth programs devoted to children ages 5-12 years. Weekly programs each thursday evening, which includes a meal, homework assistance, and teachings. Additionally, group field trips are planned throughout the year. Goals are: 1.through worship, to create opportunities for young people to encounter god. 2.through an atmosphere of love to create a surrogate family environment where every child knows they are loved, accepted and important. 3.through teaching, to equip young people with the ability to answer life's questions through the word of god as the only real source of truth and direction. 4.through socialization based upon christian principles, to train young people to be socially responsible and bold in their christian witness. 5.through prophetic revelation to identify the giftedness in each child and create opportunities for their gifts to be refined and released. 6.through teaching and counseling to bring young people into a revelation of their true god given identity.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 89
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 70
  • Sustainability: 43
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -15.1%; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.58; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.38; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 4.7% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -13.8% per year; rating input score 0; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 8.3% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 4 of 4 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $98K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 20 of 20 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2017 to 2023
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 45/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 46/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 12/100.