Tallahassee Refrigeration Air Conditioning Contractors Association Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
842508047
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2019–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Tallahassee, FL, USA
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues

Reported finances

Revenue
$27,459
Expenses
$34,182
Assets
$24,546

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Jake Brown (President)
  • Loren Mason (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Jeremy Parker (Director)
  • Patrick Barineau (Director)
  • Carre Welsh (Executive Dir.)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To foster, promote and protect the interest and welfare of its members, the air conditioning industry and the public it serves. The term air conditioning industry is understood to include any change that is accomplished to the air in an enclosed atmosphere such as cooling, heating, refrigeration, etc. To accumulate and distribute trade information, encourage better business methods and generally to advance the interest of air conditioning contractors, to cooperate with schools and colleges in expansion of courses of education training specifically designed for the air conditioning industry to encourage the cooperation of various state agencies in the sponsorship of safety education programs for Florida? S air conditioning industry as well as in other programs which are AIDS to move effective, efficient and safer operation of business in leon, wakulla, gadsden, and jefferson counties.

What it reported doing in 2025

The association had their first, second, and third apprenctices totalling 44 students.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 21
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -24.5%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.72; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 35.1%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 8% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 9.9% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2019 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 19/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 39/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 5/100.