Tall Pines Conservancy
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 391966972
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Nashotah, WI, USA
- Phone
- 2623690500
- Rating
- 90
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Land Resources Conservation
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,935,128
- Expenses
- $1,712,566
- Assets
- $4,503,693
- Liabilities
- $39,951
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JOHN KOEPKE (PAST PRESIDENT)
- KYLE ZWIEG (PRESIDENT)
- MARK WIERMAN (VICE PRESIDENT/TREASURER)
- BECKY FEDAK (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- SUSAN BUCHANAN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR THROUGH 12/24)
Highest reported compensation
- SUSAN BUCHANAN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR THROUGH 12/24): $105,525 total reported compensation
- BECKY FEDAK (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $13,192 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our mission is to preserve our rural heritage by protecting remaining farmland, water resources, natural areas and open spaces in the lake country region and beyond.
What it reported doing in 2024
Land protectionin 2022, tall pines conservancy partnered with american farmland trust (aft) and the natural resources conservation service (nrcs) to officially launch the Wisconsin farmland protection partnership project. By 2024, tall pines successfully utilized its allocation of funding through this initiative to permanently protect over 300 acres of productive farmland across two family-owned operations: the oberhaus (cozy nook) farm in the town of delafield and the monis family farm in the town of ashippun, which closed in january 2025.the oberhaus farm is a multi-generational dairy and seasonal pumpkin operation located in a rapidly developing area with soaring land values. The monis family farm, a designated sesquicentennial farm, spans over 200 acresand features a combination of high-quality agricultural soils and vital wetland and wildlife habitat.in 2024, tall pines also completed the fee-simple acquisition of the saeger creek preserve, an 80-acre natural area in the village of lac la belle that provides critical water quality benefits to the adjacent lake. Restoration efforts are now underway on both ends of the preserve: trail building and habitat enhancement on the eastern side, and a large-scale stream restoration project along saeger creek on the western side. A conservation easement for the property, held by the lac la belle management district, helps ensure its long-term protection.additional conservation success in 2024 included the completion of a 26-acre conservation easement on an organic farm in stone bank, located adjacent to a previously protected property and across the road from a localelementary school. The landowner intends to work with tall pines and the school district to develop educational programming focused on sustainable agriculture.tall pines remained a key partner in the oconomowoc watershed protection program (owpp), which empowers landowners to adopt conservation practices that reduce phosphorus runoff and improve water quality. Building on the success of the mason creek re-meandering projectcompleted in 2022 and elebrated with a public ribbon-cutting in 2023tall pines extended its watershed restoration efforts in 2024 through its support of the cottonwood creek project, a similarly modeled initiative targeting a high-priority waterway in the oconomowoc river watershed.tall pines also continued its support for farmers for lake country (fflc), a producer-led group advancing regenerative agricultural practices and soil health across a landscape now encompassing more than 450,000 acres. In 2024, tall pines contributed to fflc efforts by coordinating aerial seeding of cover crops, engaging landowners in conservation programs, and helping secure cost-share funding for practices such as no-till farming, plantinggreen, and rotational grazing.collaborative partnerships remained central to tall pines' land protection work in 2024. The conservancy partnered with waukesha county land conservancy, rock river coalition, the nature conservancy, savanna institute, gathering waters, the land trust alliance, and others to advance regional conservation priorities throughout southeast Wisconsin.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 86
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 65
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 83.5%; rating input score 84
- Program expense ratio: 93.7%; rating input score 94
- Fundraising efficiency: $40.73 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 11.5%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.63; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 6.9%; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 16% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 12.1% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 83.5% of revenue deployed · 93.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $1.6M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $106K · 13 people listed
- Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 47/100.