Talking Tech With Wayne Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 853807406
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
- Location
- Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Rating
- 70
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Adult, Continuing Education
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $189,300
- Expenses
- $41,145
- Assets
- $148,790
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Bill Nasir (Board President)
- Marsha Ellis (Board Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Bill Nasir (Board President)
- Marsha Ellis (Board Vice President)
- John Forman (Board Sectretarv)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organizations primary exempt purpose is to promote digital literacy technology access and digital safety for older adults and community members with limited access to technology through education equipment distribution and direct support services.
What it reported doing in 2025
Digital Literacy and Technology Access Programs The organization provides digital equity services focused on improving access to technology strengthening digital skills and increasing confidence in the safe and effective use of digital tools among older adults. Program activities include digital literacy education technology navigation assistance digital safety guidance and the distribution of donated computer equipment to eligible participants. During the year the organization delivered digital equity services to approximately 712 seniors including group-based education individualized assistance and access support services. As part of these efforts nine individuals directly benefited from the receipt of donated computer equipment and additional participants received stipends to support engagement in learning activities. The organization also incurred direct program service expenses necessary to deliver educational content provide participant support and operate.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 85% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 51
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 89
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 21.7%; rating input score 22
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 78.3%; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.62; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 21.7% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $41K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 22/100.