Tahrike Tarsile Qur'an, Inc.
Legal name: Tahrike Tarsile Quran Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 112579839
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2025
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Elmhurst, NY, USA
- Phone
- 516-205-6257
- Rating
- 57
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Affiliation
- Islam
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $46,055
- Expenses
- $22,378
- Assets
- $219,520
- Liabilities
- $146,189
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- AUNALI KHALFAN (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- DILSHAD GULAMHUSEIN (TREASURER)
- AUNALI KHALFAN (PRESIDENT)
- SHIRIN KHALFAN (V PRES)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Proceeds from sales of the Qur'an are used to print more copies. Qur'ans are also donated to prisons and Islamic institutions and are given to government officials and people of other faiths for the purpose of educating and enlightening them about Islamic ideology and practices. voices before God’s Apostle are the ones whose hearts have been tested for piety;” Chapter 49: verses 2, 3. Prophet Muhammad measured up to the highest standard divinely laid for him. Historians, philosophers, students of world religions, and world leaders have nothing but flowing praise for his noble personality, as well. divine mission; they do not worship Muhammad. Thus, Islam is not a new religion. According to the Qur’an, it was the religion of all the prophets of God, peace be upon them. They all submitted to God and they were all Muslims. They brought the same central message:.
What it reported doing in 2025
Educating the public on islamic teaching, traditions and philosophy. including through publishing and distributing accurate translation.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 96% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and a relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 61
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 12
- Sustainability: 68
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 48.6%; rating input score 49
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: Limited
- Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 51.4%; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 9.81; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.67; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -11.7% per year; rating input score 0; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -11.7% per year; rating input score 0; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -11.3% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: Mission, programs, and operating context captured from the official website.
- Where the money goes: 48.6% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 2 of 7 filing controls reported · 0 of 6 affiliation controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 12 of 12 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 49/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 7/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 58/100.