Taekwondo Alliance for Mission Fdn
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 463455123
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2018–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023, Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2017
- Location
- Mountain View, CA, USA
- Phone
- 6509381212
- Rating
- 77
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Recreation& Sports N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $159,080
- Expenses
- $112,369
- Assets
- $42,534
- Liabilities
- $59,385
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
2 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CHIN SONU (CEO)
People named in this filing
- CHIN SONU (CEO)
- DAVID KIM (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
1)FINANCIALLY SUPPORTED TAEKWONDO AND YOUTH EDUCATIONAL PROJECTS Fundraised and sent financial support to the following organizations: a.JASPER KIDS, THAILANDb.WOMENS NATIONAL TAEKWONDO TEAM, TAJIKISTANc.NATIONAL TAEKWONDO TRAINING CENTER, KYRGISTANd.NATIONAL TAEKWONDO TEAM, MADAGASCARe.SYRIAN REFUGEE TAEWKWONDO, JORDANf.TAEKWONDO MISSION DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE, SOUTH KOREAg.K-ART STUDIO, INDONESIAh.HOPE MISSION, UNITED KINGDOMi.EDEN SCHOOL, TANZANIAj.WEST AFRICAN NAVIGATOR TAEKWONDO PROJECT, COTE DIVIORE2)DEVELOP THE NEXT GENERATION TAEKWONDO MISSIONARIES Establish TAM Korea to recruit and train young Taekwondo Masters and prepare them for the global Taekwondo mission projectsa.Established TAM Korea, a Korean National Non-profit Corporation3)PROVIDE RESOURCES TO PUBLISH A TAEKWONDO MISISON REFERENCE MANUAL Holistic Taekwondo Mission Wrtten by Pastor Sungil Ahn.4)Establish Bay Area Sparring Team Network Support Missionary Jaesung Lee establish a network of Taekwondo schools for developin
What it reported doing in 2025
1)Provided coaching support, sponsorships, and consultation for development of Menlo College Taekwondo program.2)FINANCIALLY SUPPORTED TAEKWONDO AND YOUTH EDUCATIONAL PROJECTS Fundraised and sent financial support to the following organizations.a.TAM-KOREA, KOREAb.JASPER KIDS, THAILANDc.GRACE ACADEMY, NIGERd.TAEKWONDO MISSION DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE, SOUTH KOREAe.HOPE MISSION, UNITED KINGDOMf.EDEN SCHOOL, TANZANIAg.WEST AFRICAN NAVIGATOR TAEKWONDO PROJECT, COTE DIVIOREh.Global Vision School, CALL 20253)Developing the next generation Taekwondo Olympians.a.USA National Team Member Development scholarships and consultationb.Next generation Taekwondo instructors / masters development hosting college students 4)Performed Taekwondo Demonstrations at local festivals and City Sanctioned events.5)Provided scholarships for Taekwondo lessons for families with low-income and/or in financial crisis.6)Took 15 members to a Taekwondo service trip to Guatemala.7)Established Bay Area Sparring Team Network - Weekly training at various Taekwondo schools in the Bay Area and develop future Olympians.8)Developing West African Taekwondo Project working with Navigators of West Africa that started in 2022.9)Supported events by USA Taekwondo national team by developing an international training exchange program with Korea, hosting the USAT West Regional Poomsae Athlete Development Camp, California State Taekwondo Associations poomsae rumble, and sparring rumble.10)Hosted womens self-defense seminar for Female High School Seniors going to college.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 59
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 55
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 51%; rating input score 51
- Program expense ratio: 72.2%; rating input score 72
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 29.4%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.38; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.4; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.6% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 23% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 51% of revenue deployed · 72.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $81K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2018 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 51/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 31/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 3/100.