Tactical Evangelism

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
873557222
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2023
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2023
Location
Charleston, SC, USA
Phone
4024170860
Rating
89
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Support N.E.C.
Affiliation
Christianity

Reported finances

Revenue
$130,379
Expenses
$108,998
Assets
$39,812
Liabilities
$611

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

People named in this filing

  • Greg Walker (Executive Dir.)
  • JR Llewellyn (Chairman)
  • Douglas Potter (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To support, encourage and promote Christian evangelization by providing training and support that enable and encourage Christians to mitigate risks and safely and effectively spread the Gospel throughout the world, and to provide such other services and support as may be in furtherance or related to such purposes.

What it reported doing in 2023

The purposes of the Corporation are to support, encourage and promote Christian evangelization by providing training and support that enable and encourage Christians to mitigate risks and safely and effectively spread the Gospel throughout the world, and to provide such other services and support as may be in furtherance or related to such purposes.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 84
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 48
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 77.6%; rating input score 78
  • Program expense ratio: 92.8%; rating input score 93

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 16.4%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.37; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 8.3%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 36.9% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 50.5% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 74% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 77.6% of revenue deployed · 92.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $101K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2022 to 2023
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 29/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 22/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 41/100.