Table to Table Food Distribution Network

What it reported doing in 2024

Table to table bridges the gap between abundance and hunger. Volunteers collect surplus food from donors and redistribute it to partners and people who can use it. Our work unites community members and organizations to create a more just and less wasteful food system. Table to table (t2t) is the foundation of a complex, hunger relief system in our community. T2t distributes 2.6 million pounds of food annually to agencies serving every community in johnson county. Our food reached more than 16% - or 25,000 - county residents last year. Johnson county food relief agencies distribute nearly 4 million meals in a year. T2t is the source of more than 55% of the food available to the hunger relief network. Through initiatives spanning the food system, we capture surplus food from farms, food processors, food warehouses, the food transportation and supply chain industry, retail grocers and convenience stores, institutions, and restaurants. We prioritize the delivery of the most nutritious and otherwise cost-prohibitive foods, more than a million pounds is produce, protein, and dairy. Struggling johnson county families often dont have adequate access to food and even less access to nutritious fresh foods as these kinds of food are the costliest. Table to table efficiently keeps food out of the waste stream, minimizes food insecurity for individuals and families, and recaptures millions of dollars in valuable food for our community.

Financial Efficiency

• Mission deployment rate: 97.6%; rating input score 98
• Program expense ratio: 98.4%; rating input score 98
• Fundraising efficiency: $234.75 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

• Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 20th percentile among comparable filings
• Pay-setting controls: Limited
• Foreign activity oversight: Limited
• Grant itemization coverage: Limited
• Major donor itemization: Limited
• Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

• Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
• Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
  • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
  • Whistleblower policy: Pass
  • Document-retention policy: Pass
  • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
  • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
  • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
  • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
  • Audit committee oversight: Pass
  • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

• Operating margin: 0.3%; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
• Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.08; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
• Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
• Officer compensation ratio: 0.9%; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

• Program expense growth: 8.3% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
• Revenue growth: 8.2% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
• Asset growth: 15.3% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings