Tabitha Grand Island Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 843824792
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2023–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2022
- Location
- Grand Island, NE, USA
- Phone
- 4024849660
- Rating
- 77
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Senior Citizens' Housing/Retirement Communities
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $9,395,933
- Expenses
- $12,633,083
- Assets
- $45,821,322
- Liabilities
- $53,364,781
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Jon Riewer (President & CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- Jon Riewer (President & CEO): $565,673 total reported compensation
- Brian Shanks (Former Officer): $326,070 total reported compensation
- Darin Ohe (CFO): $317,768 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Provides independent living, assisted living, memory care and long-term care for seniors.
What it reported doing in 2024
Tabitha Grand Island, Inc. was organized to develop and build a senior housing facility in Grand Island, Nebraska. Tabitha at Prairie Commons has 36 skilled nursing beds, 40 assisted living units, and 81 independent living units. The skilled nursing program provides rehabilitation programs, including physical, occupational, and speech therapy, spiritual counseling, social workers, coordinated activities, and continual health planning. The assisted living program provides maintenance free residences, around-the-clock personal care, and activities in a secure living community. Additionally, Tabitha at Prairie Commons Assisted Living Memory Care unit provides security and safety for adults with memory loss.Occupancy was 60% for skilled nursing, 90% for assisted living, and 62% for independent living.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 94% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and most voting board members are independent. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 85
- Transparency & Controls: 60
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 34
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 88.5%; rating input score 89
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -34.5%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.63; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.16; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0.7%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 56.2% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 95.7% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -11.2% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 88.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $11.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $566K · 9 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $169K reported
- Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 9 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 3/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 3/100.