Tabernacle Project

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
333930600
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Wilmington, NC, USA
Rating
72
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Religion Related N.E.C.

Reported finances

Revenue
$57,512
Expenses
$33,139
Assets
$24,373

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Spencer Daniel Wilson (CEO)

People named in this filing

  • Spencer Daniel Wilson (CEO)
  • Alan Michael Smith (CFO)
  • Tucker Daniel Beerman (COO)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Tabernacle Project provides consistent weekly communal gatherings dedicated to spiritual formation moral encouragement and holistic mental wellness. By integrating spiritual disciplines with community-based support the program fosters a structured environment for ethical development and emotional resilience. These gatherings serve to strengthen the moral fabric of the community through peer support spiritual mentorship and the provision of resources for personal and relational growth.

What it reported doing in 2025

Tabernacle Project facilitates consistent weekly gatherings focused on spiritual formation moral encouragement and community-based mental health support. These gatherings provide a structured environment for holistic personal growth fostering spiritual resilience and ethical development through communal study and peer support. In the past year the organization held 100+ gatherings serving an average of 50+ community members monthly providing them with resources for mental wellness and character building within a faith-based framework.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 94% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 74
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 53
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 57.6%; rating input score 58
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 42.4%; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.74; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 84.9%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 57.6% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $33K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 58/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 40/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 0/100.