Ta-ta Trot Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
472317860
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2019
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2019
Location
Northumberland, PA, USA
Phone
5708980817
Rating
78
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Breast Cancer Research

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,022
Expenses
$3,303
Assets
$22,009

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • LISA PFLEEGOR (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • JULIE KAY ROCKEY (FOUNDER)
  • LISA PFLEEGOR (PRESIDENT)
  • JESSICA C WAGNER (CO-TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Ta-ta trot inc's mission is to help raise funds for the promotion of breast health and survivorship programs provided by other 501(c)(3) organizations in Pennsylvania especially the susquehanna valley area. Programs include mammography screenings, medical and non-medical financial assistance, breast cancer survivorship oriented lectures and other educational activities for breast cancer patients.

What it reported doing in 2019

The ta-ta trot is the largest 5k run/walk event in the susquehanna valley with many participants. Donations and special event income netted 12,723 for the benefit of local breast health organizations. Those organizations benefited in 2018 were evangelical community hospital's thyra m. Humphreys center for breast health, geisinger health sysytem's marie lamey fund, and the pa breast cancer coalition. Disbursements in the amount of 25,065 were made during the current year.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 84
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 34
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 56.9%; rating input score 57

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -223.2%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.66; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -39.4% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -39.3% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 24.7% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 56.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2014 to 2019
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 57/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 4/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.