Ta 4 Life Foundation Inc Anderson
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 466699944
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2015–2018
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2018
- Location
- Ponte Vedra Beach, FL, USA
- Phone
- 9126380330
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Human Services N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Expenses
- $4,854
- Assets
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- STACEY L ANDERSON (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- STACEY L ANDERSON (PRESIDENT)
- KIM SMITH (VICE PRESIDN)
- MAC BARNHARDT (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide financial assistance and support to individuals and families with life altering experiences caused by injury or disease and contribute to the continuation of head trauma education and research. The foundation hopes to close the gap in cost and care that famailies face following a member of their family suffering severe head trauma. The ta 4 life foundation, inc. Has been established to give every person impacted by injury and illnesss the opprotunity of returning to a normal life by finding resources and identifying funding vehicles make all the difference in a patient's financial well-being. Ta 4 life foundation, inc. Provides financial assistance in the form of payment of medical bills. Travel expenses, rehabilitation cost and other financial needs associated with victims of traumas and their families.
What it reported doing in 2018
Payment of medical bills, travel expenses, rehabilitation costs and other financial needs associated with victims of traumas and their families.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 26
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 10
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: 67.7%; rating input score 68
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 18.5% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -90.9% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -103% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 67.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $3K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 2 of 2 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2015 to 2018
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 14/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.