T-ten Instructor Community
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 611736378
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
- Location
- Leesburg, VA, USA
- Phone
- 7036696600
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Job Training
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $110,784
- Expenses
- $159,669
- Assets
- $75,656
- Liabilities
- $14,450
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
People named in this filing
- CHRIS LANGSWAGER (SECRETARY)
- TONIA HANEY (BOARD MEMBER)
- JEFFREY CROMWELL (CHAIR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The t-ten instructor community provides training in practical instructional methods, productive recruitment, and effective program coordination. The community desires to help each instructor, coordinator, and recruiter develop skills that directly result in improved outcomes for our students, supporting dealerships, and ultimately, the toyota and lexus consumers.
What it reported doing in 2025
T-ten instructor training conference: a training and instructional development event hosted in august of 2025 at collin college, in allen, Texas, with 120 attendees. The event included members of the t-ten instructor community who gathered to provide practical instructional methods with curriculum development skills training that directly results in production of effective t-ten program curricula, aligned with the occupational requirements required to be a toyota or lexus technician and to provide practical instructional methods with product development skills training that directly results in the development of effective recruiting methods.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 16
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -44.1%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.47; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.19; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 2.7%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 36/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 16/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 25/100.