System Management Interface Forum Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
870695112
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2013–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2018, Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Richardson, TX, USA
Phone
9726699730
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$121,900
Expenses
$63,573
Assets
$170,407
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

People named in this filing

  • CHRIS JONES (DIRECTOR)
  • DAVID DURANT (DIRECTOR)
  • MATTHEW SCHURMANN (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide a support organization and forum for the advancement and adoption of certain power management system technologies and associated applications based on national and international standards. To support the rapid advancement of an efficient and compatible technology base that promotes power management and implementations. The organization will carry out these purposes by providing a forum for members to review requirements and specifications for product compatibility, educating business and consumer communities as to the value of the power management technologies, protecting the needs of consumers by supporting the implementation of compliance test procedures and processes, maintaining relationships with educational and governmental institutions that support and contribute to the development of specifications and standards, and by fostering competition in the development of new technologies in conformance with antitrust laws and regulations.

What it reported doing in 2024

Hosted weekly pmbus standard group meeting to facilitate discussion of the standards and specifications supported by the organization and plans for their further development.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 85
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 47.8%; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.68; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 3.1% per year; rating input score 100; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -3.3% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2013 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.