Sword of the Spirit Missions Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
201168369
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2023
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2023
Location
Escondido, CA, USA
Phone
8583820789
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Christianity
Affiliation
Christianity

Reported finances

Revenue
$0
Expenses
$1,188
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DAVIS FERREIRA (President)
  • JANINE CLARK (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • DAVIS FERREIRA (President)
  • JANINE CLARK (Vice President)
  • MICHELLE GARCIA (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The primary objective of the corporation is to minister to people in crisis. What the word of god teached about walking through adversity in the fact made possible though jesus christ.

What it reported doing in 2023

The primary objective of the corporation is to minister to people in crisis what the word of god teaches about walking though adversity in the fact made possible through jesus christ. All ministry work is done biblially and prayerfully, physiological disorders observed in patients may constitute referral to a professional licensed phychologist or psychiatrist. The secondary objective is to equip and train lay persons to mentor and minister to people in crisis. The purpose is to offer hope and emotional help to people who may or may not be able to afford professional conseling.the organization's puposes were carried out in 2022 by serving approximately 52 people on a regualr or semi-regular basis throughout the year. Materials were provided to these people along with weekly group meetings.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 7
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 7.8% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -3.6% per year; rating input score 0; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 5.5% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 4 of 4 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2011 to 2023
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is recorded as not currently operating in California.