Swing For Success
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 332698647
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Nampa, ID, USA
- Phone
- 2086298351
- Rating
- 57
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $14,120
- Expenses
- $6,500
- Assets
- $7,620
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Christian Wall (Founder and CEO)
People named in this filing
- Christian Wall (Founder and CEO)
- Charlise Wall (Volunteer Program Assistant)
- Jeremy Cork (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Swing for Success is a nonprofit organization dedicated to providing youth with access to golf, mentorship, and life skills programs. Our mission is to foster personal growth, education, leadership, and community engagement through sports-based learning opportunities that empower young people to achieve their potential.
What it reported doing in 2025
Swing for Success provides youth with access to golf instruction, mentorship, and life skills programs designed to promote personal growth, discipline, teamwork, and community engagement. During the year, we offered weekly golf lessons, one-on-one mentoring, and leadership workshops to teach goal-setting, sportsmanship, and healthy activity habits. We organized and sponsored local junior golf tournaments and events to give participants competitive experience and exposure to scholarship opportunities. The organization also provided golf equipment, training materials, and transportation assistance to ensure all youth could participate regardless of financial need. This year, approximately 25 youth participated in our programs, benefiting from skill development, mentorship, and educational support through our programs.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 26
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 72
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 17.7%; rating input score 18
- Program expense ratio: 38.5%; rating input score 38
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 54%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.17; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 17.7% of revenue deployed · 38.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 18/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 38/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 52/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.