Swim Bike Run Triathlon Club

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
461881441
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Chesterfield, MO, USA
Phone
6788583671
Rating
33
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Amateur Sports Competitions

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,160
Expenses
$23,455
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Peter Gonzalez (President)
  • Scott Hainz (Vice President)
  • Curtis Brooks (Past-President)

People named in this filing

  • Peter Gonzalez (President)
  • Scott Hainz (Vice President)
  • Gene Clower (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Swim Bike Run promotes the development of amateur adult and youth athletes in the sport of triathlon. SBR offers its members instruction in the fundamentals of each discipline of triathlon (swimming, cycling and running). SBR strives to develop amateur athletes to reach their full potential in competing in triathlon events. SBR does not provide facilities but rather encourages its members to participate in local events. Members are also encouraged to participate in group training sponsored by local triathlon, cycling and running shops as well as athletic clubs.

What it reported doing in 2024

Bi-annual training camps where members spend the day practicing race day conditions. Includes instructions and structured training by qualified coach including discussions on race tactics and nutrition. All levels of experience are included and tailored to the individuals level.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 8
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -1,922%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -18.4% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -19.7% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -5.1% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2014 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.