Swiftsure Ranch Therapeutic Equestrian Center Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
820461587
IRS 990 coverage
2015–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Bellevue, ID, USA
Phone
2085789111
Rating
72
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Developmentally Disabled Centers

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$718,550
Expenses
$990,497
Assets
$4,355,419
Liabilities
$200,411

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

13 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CHARLOTTE WESTENDORF (PRESIDENT)
  • PAUL BENNETT (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • MARY MITTEN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • MARY MITTEN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $60,254 total reported compensation
  • PAUL BENNETT (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $6,000 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide equine-assisted activities and therapies which encourage the physical, mental and emotional well-being of children and adults with disabilities.

What it reported doing in 2024

Swiftsure ranch's mission is to provide equine-assisted activities and therapies which encourage the physical, mental and emotional well-being of children and adults with disabilities. Our vision is to provide a positive, healing environment for all who participate in our programs and for all to leave feeling better than when they arrived. Through mutual participation in our program we empower our riders, volunteers and staff to experience more fulfilling lives. All of our services are provided at no charge to the student/rider. In 2024 we served about 250 riders with the youngest rider, age 4 and oldest rider in their 90s. In addition to these regular students, we provide our services to several other organizations, again at no charge. These other organizations currently are: Idaho school for the deaf and blind, camp rainbow gold (camp for children with cancer)and veteran programs, higher ground and boise va hospital. The Idaho special olympics no longer provides an equestrian component during their games, so we started hosting the jr. Rodeo and stampede where riders from all over the state come and participate in equestrian events and are treated to a bbq and dance. With these additional programs, the total individuals reached through our program are 250 - 300 riders a year, again all at no charge. Our students are referred to our program by their physicians, therapists, social workers or from the special education programs in the school system. We serve a large variety of disabilities including: genetic disabilities, learning/cognitive disabilities as well as those who have had a major event in their lives that have caused them to become disabled, such as a stoke, accident or degenerative disease. During the summer we provide a ranch hand program which encourages young teens to develop employable skills, learn work ethics, the ability to work in groups, resume development and volunteerism.many of our students may receive traditional therapy in our community and we supplement this work but there are many who no longer have benefits or qualify for therapy and we provide a year round progressive resource. The horse's movement mimics human walking so those who are unable to move under their own power or do not have full range of motion can benefit from the horses core movement so when they are on the horse with no back support, they see improvement in their core strength and balance. There are also physical and emotional benefits from interacting with horses and we have had children speak their first words here on the ranch. We have found that children with attention deficit issues are more engaged with their instructor while on horseback, as they have to pay attention to remain on the horse. We have also had teachers/aides tell us that this effect lasts long after the lesson. So no matter what the disability we have found that the use of horses, trained volunteers, and our certified instructors is providing a very important niche in our area.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 89% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 73
  • Transparency & Controls: 86
  • Accountability: 74
  • Sustainability: 38
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 89.5%; rating input score 90
  • Program expense ratio: 64.2%; rating input score 64
  • Fundraising efficiency: $4.42 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -37.8%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.4; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 6.7%; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -0.2% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -7% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -1.3% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 89.5% of revenue deployed · 64.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 3 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $636K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $60K · 13 people listed
  • Consistency: 30 of 31 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2015 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 15/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 4/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 48/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 53/100.