Sweet Relief Musicians Fund
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 954443269
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2017–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Brea, CA, USA
- Phone
- 7146260447
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,553,825
- Expenses
- $3,907,518
- Assets
- $878,330
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- WILLIAM BENNETT (President)
- VICTORIA WILLIAMS (Vice President)
Highest reported compensation
- WILLIAM BENNETT (President): $151,625 total reported compensation
- ARIC STEINBERG (Director): $88,237 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Financial assistance and case management for qualified musicians who are elderly and retired or semi-retired, or for any qualified musician who has medical or medically related expenses they cannot pay.
What it reported doing in 2025
Sweet relief provides financial assistance and case management for qualified musicians who are in need of medical care and/or are elderly and meet certain requirements. Grants are decided on a case-by-case basis by a committee of musicians according to the applicant's needs, other resources that might be available, and other factors, such as the applicant's contributions to music. Non-measureable achievements include: directing inquiries and grant receipients to other private charities as well as public programs they might not be aware of, and intervening with and advocating for others on their behalf including medical providers and other vendors.in the past sweet relief has provided services, guidance, and cost savings to over 1,000 artists and music industry workers. One million dollars in aid from other partner charities, local, state and federal programs were awarded with the assistance of sweet relief fund staff members. Sweet relief also accounted for over one million dollars in savings by helping to negotiate medical bills and insurance costs to our constituency.our primary sources of information are our website, and our myspace and facebook sites, which reach thousands of people daily and increase awareness of our services of socioeconomic issues that face musicians, and of what other options exist for musicians in need. Sweet relief has focused our efforts in an area not managed by any other charity currently assisting the music industry. The directed individuals fund has helped severly ill and disabled applicants facing overwhelming financial distress. Patients afflicted with stage 4 cancer, als, spinal injuries among others have benefitted from sweet relief paying for medical treatments sometimes exceeding $10,000. Our goal has been to not only help, but sometimes fix, a situation completely. This is a mission we are working, in earnest, on a daily and yearly basis. We also seek to remind fans and others of the important role that music and musicians play in our lives.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 87% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 92
- Transparency & Controls: 71
- Accountability: 78
- Sustainability: 19
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 86.4%; rating input score 86
- Fundraising efficiency: $26.13 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 77.8%; rating input score 78; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -53%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.22; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 6.1%; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 29.2% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 14.1% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 13.1% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 86.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 9 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $3.4M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $152K · 9 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2017 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 6/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 50/100.