Sweeny Economic Development Corp
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 760596624
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2010
- Forms available
- Form 990 2010
- Location
- Sweeny, TX, USA
- Phone
- 9795483249
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Public, Societal Benefit
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $152,071
- Expenses
- $116,141
- Assets
- $899,020
- Liabilities
- $375,122
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2010. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2010. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Promote economic development for the city of sweeny, Texas.
What it reported doing in 2010
Sweeny industrial park - purchase of land improvements and infrastructure improvements for new industrial park which will be for the benefit of the city of sweeny and its residents with the introduction of new business into sweeny.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 67% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Accountability: 64
- Sustainability: 76
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 23.6%; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 7.74; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.42; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -107.9% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 1.9% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $88K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 15 of 15 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes grants
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2009 to 2010
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 21/100.