Swarthmore College

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
231352683
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
Location
Swarthmore, PA, USA
Phone
610-328-8533
Rating
82
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Undergraduate College (4-year)

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$382,192,696
Expenses
$329,419,722
Assets
$3,870,675,000
Liabilities
$694,607,000

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

65 people listed

Highest reported compensation

  • VALERIE SMITH (PRES./EX OFFICIO BOARD MEMBER): $1,414,844 total reported compensation
  • ELIZABETH BOLUCH-WOOD (FRMR VP OF COLLEGE ADVANCE): $821,928 total reported compensation
  • ROBERT GOLDBERG (VP FINANCE & ADMIN & TREASURER): $671,401 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Swarthmore College provides an education of intellectual rigor and social responsibility, preparing students to lead lives of purpose, impact, and fulfillment.

What it reported doing in 2024

Swarthmore is a co-educational college of liberal arts and engineering dedicated to intellectual exploration, access, and educating for the common good. The average enrollment for fiscal year 2024-25 was 1,702. There were 191 students studying abroad. Of the total student population, 1,459 come from across the united states while 243 come from other nations. Swarthmore's commitment to financial aid and access is at the core of our educational mission. The college strives to make it possible for all admitted students to attend swarthmore, regardless of their ability to pay, and meets 100 percent of determined need for all admitted students. Nearly 54 percent of students received need-based swarthmore scholarship aid from an overall financial aid expenditures of $60 million. Swarthmore's aid awards consist of grants (which do not need to be repaid) and the expectation that students will work in a part-time campus-based job. The college's financial aid awards are loan-free. Swarthmore's 425-acre arboretum campus includes the crum woods, a naturally wooded area comprising nearly three-fifths of the college's land. In 2015, the college launched its environmental sustainability framework, a set of guidelines for capital projects and facilities operations that includes sustainable building guidelines and a project checklist. The following year, the college instituted a carbon charge that provides funding for campus initiatives and projects that increase energy conservation and efficiency and promote renewable energy. Swarthmore was honored to receive a 2017 sustainable campus excellence award in the innovative collaboration category from the international sustainable campus network for our carbon charge program. Swarthmore college is committed to the principle of equal opportunity for all qualified persons, without discrimination against any person by reason of sex, race, color, age, religion, national origin, handicap, or sexual orientation. This policy is consistent with relevant governmental statues and regulations, including those pursuant to title ix of the federal education amendments of 1972 and section 504 of the federal rehabilitation act of 1973.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 77% for direct work, and 23% for grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 71
  • Transparency & Controls: 83
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 77
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 79%; rating input score 79
  • Program expense ratio: 78.2%; rating input score 78
  • Fundraising efficiency: $3.22 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
    • Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
    • Requires narrative reports: Fail
    • Conducts field audits: Fail
    • May suspend future funding: Fail
    • Requires financial reports: Fail
    • Conducts site visits: Fail
    • Requires grant agreements: Fail
    • May require repayment: Fail
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 13.8%; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 11.75; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.18; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 3.1%; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 5.9% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5.3% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 5.4% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 3 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 79% of revenue deployed · 78.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 39 of 39 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $257.6M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $1.4M · 65 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $67M reported
  • Consistency: 46 of 46 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 14 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 36 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 7 of 8 not reported.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 12/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 36/100.