Swara Brain Train Charities

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
861363933
IRS 990 coverage
2020–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Las Vegas, NV, USA
Phone
5708863981
Rating
46
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Rehabilitative Medical Services

Reported finances

Revenue
$18,113
Expenses
$291
Assets
$927,190
Liabilities
$54

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Sucharita Raman (Director, President and Treasurer)
  • Sujana Kantharaj (Director and Vice- President)

People named in this filing

  • Sucharita Raman (Director, President and Treasurer)
  • Christine Eng (Director and Secretary)
  • Sujana Kantharaj (Director and Vice- President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of SwaRa Brain Train Charities is to promote the rehabilitation of adults with Brain Injuries by conducting educational seminars and providing scholarships & training to individuals pursuing further studies that will enable them to care for persons with Brain Injury. Medical & non-medical personnel & family members of individuals with brain injuries are encouraged to participate. contd on Sch O.

What it reported doing in 2024

The President is collaborating with a premier organization in India, that have three other facilities for Brain Injury Rehabilitation. We are in discussion to set up a similar facility in Chennai, India, to provide rehabilitation services, education of patients and families, education and training for caregivers and therapists, educating public on head injury prevention and first aid and rapid transfer of head injury patients to a trauma facility.

Operating model

Revenue model
Investment-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 70
  • Sustainability: 88
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 98.4%; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3,186.22; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -97.1% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 0.7% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 3 of 3 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 15 of 15 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 37/100.