Swansboro EMS Rescue Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 581475789
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2016
- Forms available
- Form 990 2016
- Location
- Swansboro, NC, USA
- Phone
- 2523619331
- Rating
- 77
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Ambulance, Emergency Medical Transport Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $159,411
- Expenses
- $133,921
- Assets
- $607,178
- Liabilities
- $357,256
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Kenny Jackson (President)
People named in this filing
- Kenny Jackson (President)
- Matthew Hayslip (Chief)
- Jim Metro (Asst. Chief)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To save lives in a professional and confidential manner at all times and to make their community a better place to live by providing lifesaving instruction to all persons.
What it reported doing in 2016
To provide trained medical assistance and respond to emergency/rescue calls in Swansboro and surrounding areas.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 73% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 65
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Accountability: 76
- Sustainability: 68
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 68%; rating input score 68
- Program expense ratio: 80.9%; rating input score 81
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 16%; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.53; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.59; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 10.8% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -3.6% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -0.2% per year; rating input score 0; 36th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 68% of revenue deployed · 80.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $108K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 14 people listed
- Consistency: 22 of 22 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2013 to 2016
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 7 not reported.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 12/100.