Swan City Soccer Club Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
593149699
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Lakeland, FL, USA
Phone
8636830708
Rating
80
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Boys and Girls Clubs

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$269,095
Expenses
$241,890
Assets
$165,733
Liabilities
$95,609

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ALICIA JAMES (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • EOGHAN CONLON (DIRECTOR)
  • DANIEL CORBETT (VP OF RECREA)
  • DREW HORWARD (VP OF TRAVEL)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Swan city soccer club is committed to providing a superior inclusive soccer experience for all of the aera's youth by offering both recreational and highly competitive travel team opprtunties. This commitment is accomplished through an organization of volunteers and soccer professionslas.

What it reported doing in 2024

Swan city soccer club continues to support the growth and development of youth through soccer-focused programs that promote physical activity, teamwork, leadership, and community engagement. Beyond competitive team play, the club organized various community initiatives and educational outreach programs during the year, including: financial assistance program provided need-based scholarships and financial aid to ensure that children from economically disadvantaged backgrounds had access to year-round training, equipment, and competition. Community outreach clinics conducted free soccer clinics at local parks and schools to introduce the sport to underserved youth populations, fostering inclusivity and accessibility regardless of skill level or financial status. Player development & mentorship offered supplemental training sessions, college recruiting guidance, and mentorship for players navigating academic and athletic futures, particularly through our npl and usl pathways. Volunteer & leadership programs engaged families and older youth in volunteer opportunities, coaching support roles, and leadership development, reinforcing the club's commitment to civic responsibility and personal growth. Field and facility support collaborated with the city of lakeland and local stakeholders to maintain and improve public soccer fields, ensuring safe, accessible spaces for recreation and community use.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 89% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 83
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 64
  • Sustainability: 47
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 89.9%; rating input score 90
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 10.1%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.69; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.58; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 2.6% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.5% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 5.6% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 89.9% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 4 of 4 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $242K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 17 of 17 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 31/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 10/100.