Svhs Cheerleader Booster Club
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 364664113
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2020
- Location
- Spring Branch, TX, USA
- Rating
- 65
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $119,005
- Expenses
- $68,549
- Assets
- $202,096
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Kathy Renfrow (President)
- Jimi Roberson (Co-President)
- Haley Mitschke (1st Vice President)
- Katie Tewksbury (2nd Vice President)
- Lindsey Plake (3rd Vice President of Fundraising)
People named in this filing
- Kathy Renfrow (President)
- Jimi Roberson (Co-President)
- Haley Mitschke (1st Vice President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide support to the Smithson Valley High School Cheerleading program. Please see schedule O
What it reported doing in 2025
Provided special events team bonding and end of year Banquet to team members which recognized their accomplishments throughout the year and highlighted team members achievements and awards. Approximately students served.55
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 91% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 54
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 75
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 42.4%; rating input score 42
- Program expense ratio: 73.6%; rating input score 74
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 42.4%; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.95; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -13.4% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -6.6% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 25.1% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 42.4% of revenue deployed · 73.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $50K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 42/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.