Sv Home
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 814755729
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2017–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2016
- Location
- San Jose, CA, USA
- Phone
- 4084717643
- Rating
- 73
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Research Institutes and Public Policy Analysis
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,848,466
- Expenses
- $2,034,186
- Assets
- $1,529,323
- Liabilities
- $72,119
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
21 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- REGINA CELESTIN WILLIAMS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- REGINA CELESTIN WILLIAMS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $207,794 total reported compensation
- JOSH ISHIMATSU (DEPUTY DIRECTOR): $152,933 total reported compensation
- MATTHEW REED (DIRECTOR OF POLICY): $137,287 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Driving the creation of affordable housing for a more vibrant and equitable silicon valley.
What it reported doing in 2024
Sv@home paves the way for local and regional solutions to santa clara county's housing crisis by working to streamline the housing development process, identify land opportunities, increase funding for new affordable homes, and change the conversation around housing and affordable housing. To accomplish this work, we join with community members, philanthropic, nonprofit, and business leaders, elected officials, and developers to leverage our resources, magnify our voices, and advance collaborative solutions to California's housing crisis.see schedule o for continuation.learn policy and researchsv@home provides opportunities for community members and interested persons to learn more about affordable housing. Through regular communication, using social media, earned media, and e-news, sv@home publishes information about housing topics, current issues, and new solutions. Additionally, sv@home collects data, information, and best practices, and conducts original research to educate people about the affordable housing challenge, the progress that has been made in meeting our housing construction goals, and successful ways to respond. Lastly, sv@home leads the conversation around affordable housing to raise awareness, debunk myths, and change the dialogue. Act advocacysv@home advocates for local, regional, and state policies and programs that increase the housing supply for people at all income levels, with a focus on lower-income families and individuals. Working together with our partners, sv@home convenes a broad coalition to support progressive policies that increase the supply of affordable housing, preserve the existing affordable housing stock, and help current residents stay in the communities they call home. The ultimate goal of our advocacy is to provide an opportunity for all people in santa clara county to have access to affordable housing, enhancing our quality of life and providing a foundation for equal opportunity, diversity, and livability.engage meetings and eventssv@home hosts lunchtime forums, roundtables, networking events, and special event meetings that offer community members, elected officials, city staff, developers, financial professionals, nonprofit partners, and corporate employees the opportunity to collaborate around housing solutions. In addition to regular events throughout the year, sv@home convenes santa clara county's affordable housing month annually, a series of events hosted by sv@home and community partners each may. As a result of sv@home's broad outreach, these events foster new partnerships and collaborative efforts around an issue that affects everyone.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 91% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 66
- Transparency & Controls: 76
- Accountability: 90
- Sustainability: 25
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 72.7%; rating input score 73
- Program expense ratio: 65.7%; rating input score 66
- Fundraising efficiency: $8.67 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -10%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.75; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 35.1%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.7% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.3% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.5% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 72.7% of revenue deployed · 65.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 16 of 16 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $208K · 21 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2017 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 33/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 17/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 34/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 5/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 53/100.