Sustainable Nevada

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
465123762
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2015–2018
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2018
Location
Reno, NV, USA
Phone
7757468238
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Natural Resources Conservation and Protection

Reported finances

Revenue
$0
Expenses
$1,145
Assets
$1,159
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JENEANE HARTER (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • LARRY BURTON (DIRECTOR)
  • JANA VANDERHAAR (SECRETARY)
  • JUSTIN JONES (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Sustainable Nevada helps schools design, develop and implement ecoliteracy programs resulting in students prepared to create sustainable communities that protect and preserve the environment.

What it reported doing in 2018

Community curriculum - we provide program design, development and implementation services to schools that lowers classroom walls to allow learning to flow between teachers, students and community members via innovative science curriculum. The program engages teachers and students by: 1. Leveraging district technology and software 2. Providing real-world hands-on activities 3. Using community stem/steam professionals as partners 4. Incorporating arts activities directly related to the Nevada academic content standards for science. Community curriculum reaches 7,760 students, 50.4% are white, 41.3% are hispanic, 0.6% are black, 1.8% are asian or pacific islander and 2.3% are american indian or native of Alaska. 51.2% are economically disadvantaged.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 29
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.01; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -99.8% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -100.4% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -50.8% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2015 to 2018
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 48/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.