Sustain Ukraine Nonprofit Incorporated

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
991246851
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Red Bluff, CA, USA
Phone
7078886837
Rating
90
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
International Relief

Reported finances

Revenue
$62,997
Expenses
$59,506
Assets
$1,698
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Denise Flores (President)

People named in this filing

  • Denise Flores (President)
  • Bogdan Prodan (Treasurer)
  • Daniel Loope (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Incorporated in New Jersey in 2024 and received 501(c)(3) tax-exempt status in September 2024. This is our second filing year. Our mission is to source and deliver medical supplies, tactical safety equipment, and humanitarian aid directly to medical personnel and defenders serving on the front lines in Ukraine.

What it reported doing in 2025

Demining award $1500; extra large 3D printer for custom prosthetics manufacturing for Ternopil Hospital award $800 ; Medical supplies, chest seals, tourniquets, gauze $17,818 ; Transport vehicles $21,350 ; protective gear $4,553 ; humanitarian aid, power supply $7,015 ; administrative costs $258 ; shipping/logistics/transport costs $2,326, Cold weather gear/fuel $1442, EW devices & safety tech $1,900 ; bank fees $543 ;

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 95% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 96
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 42
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 94.5%; rating input score 94
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 5.5%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.03; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 94.5% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $60K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 8/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 54/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.