Susanne P Boyd and Darrel Boyd Foundation for Animal Welfare

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
456599680
IRS 990-PF coverage
2020–2025
Forms available
Form 990-PF 2025
Location
Pleasant Valley, NY, USA
Phone
8454541110
Rating
83
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Wildlife Preservation, Protection

Reported finances

Revenue
$126,936
Expenses
$75,049

Source: IRS Form 990-PF. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Overview

Mission

Wildlife Preservation, Protection

What it reported funding in 2025

The foundation reported 11 filed grant rows totaling $51,000. The stated grant purposes included to strengthen the natural bond between humans and animals with programs and services to enhance the well-being of all., to rescue and care of stray and abandoned cats and kittens, providing medical care in sanctuary, and to protect the welfare of animals and to promote the humane treatment and well being of our dogs, cats and other critters., plus 8 other reported purposes.

Operating model

Revenue model
Investment-supported. 100% of the foundation's positive operating resources came from recurring investment income.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The foundation distributed 92% of its reported charitable disbursements as grants.
  • Includes asset-sale income: Asset-sale income is shown separately from recurring resources when classifying the revenue model.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes to charitable grants and the filed numbers largely add up. Assets provide a limited cushion relative to annual grants.

Rating breakdown

  • Grant Deployment: 87
  • Cost Efficiency: 68
  • Transparency: 100
  • Compliance: 100
  • Endowment Health: 30

Detailed rating inputs

Grant Deployment

  • Grant deployment ratio: 87.1%; rating input score 87; 20th percentile among comparable filings

Cost Efficiency

  • Grant expense ratio: 68%; rating input score 68; 23rd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency

  • Grant recipient disclosure: Yes; rating input score 100

Compliance

  • Foundation activity disclosures: 19 of 19 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Property sale or exchange with a disqualified person: Pass
    • Borrowing from or lending to a disqualified person: Pass
    • Goods, services, or facilities involving a disqualified person: Pass
    • Compensation paid to a disqualified person: Pass
    • Assets transferred to a disqualified person: Pass
    • Payment to a government official: Pass
    • Uncorrected prior self-dealing: Pass
    • Prior-year undistributed income: Pass
    • Excess business holdings: Pass
    • Investments that may jeopardize charitable purposes: Pass
    • Uncorrected prior-year jeopardizing investments: Pass
    • Attempt to influence legislation: Pass
    • Attempt to influence an election: Pass
    • Individual grants for travel, study or similar purposes: Pass
    • Grants outside qualifying charitable organization categories: Pass
    • Spending for a noncharitable purpose: Pass
    • Funds received for a personal-benefit contract: Pass
    • Premiums paid on a personal-benefit contract: Pass
    • Prohibited tax-shelter transaction: Pass
  • Filing consistency checks: 10; rating input score 100

Endowment Health

  • Endowment-health comparison: 12.46; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Grants: 100% of grant recipient detail disclosed
  • Payout: 87.1% grant deployment rate
  • Trustees: Filed trustees detail
  • Self-dealing: 100% of reviewed questions answered “No”
  • Investments: 30th percentile for endowment coverage
  • Consistency: 10 of 10 current checks pass
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2020 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 12 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Endowment Health: Endowment-health comparison scored 30/100.