Survivors of Violent Crimes Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 822522657
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2017–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2022
- Location
- Red Bank, NJ, USA
- Phone
- 7327491362
- Rating
- 58
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Victims' Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $23,408
- Expenses
- $10,592
- Assets
- $17,820
- Liabilities
- $13,749
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Donna Ongsiako (President)
People named in this filing
- Donna Ongsiako (President)
- Tiffany Ott (Treasurer)
- Dana Richards (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide survivors of violent crimes with CAM service resources, resources for healing, education, empowerment and raising government and community awareness of non-combat PTSD.
What it reported doing in 2024
The organization brings survivors of violent crimes and their families and friends together for support, education and empowerment thru peer support meet-ups, victim advocacy and awareness via social media, in person community events and by guest speaking/speaking engagements. 2024 we focused on the 7 Pillars of Wellness series of webinars. Donna Ongsiako recorded her story for the podcast Lived to Tell. Provided direct victim support of 35 therapeutic services.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 34
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 69
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 22.9%; rating input score 23
- Program expense ratio: 50.7%; rating input score 51
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 54.8%; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.68; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.77; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 10.4% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 40.5% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 42.6% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 22.9% of revenue deployed · 50.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $5K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2017 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 23/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 51/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 7/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.