Survivor Ventures
Legal name: Survivor Ventures Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 832401527
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Jul 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2019
- Location
- Norfolk, VA, US
- Phone
- (757) 317-0352
- Rating
- 88
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Victims' Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,130,044
- Expenses
- $1,334,057
- Assets
- $121,755
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
17 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- TIFFANY MCGEE (FOUNDER & PRESIDENT)
- TARA JONES (VICE PRESIDENT)
- JENNIFER HOLMES (CEO/HOUSING PROGRAM DIRECTOR)
- KAYLA ROBERTS UNTIL 101224 (CEO/S2E PROGRAM DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- QUINTINA SONNIE (COO/HOLISTIC CARE DIRECTOR): $77,100 total reported compensation
- JENNIFER HOLMES (CEO/HOUSING PROGRAM DIRECTOR): $77,027 total reported compensation
- MELISSA FRENCH (CPO/S2E PROGRAM DIRECTOR): $75,947 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Providing survivors of human trafficking & commercial sexual exploitation with the support & resources needed to attain economic empowerment.
What it reported doing in 2024
In 2024, we served 105 trafficking survivors, 68 in va and 34 in de and 3 in the greater washinton dc metro region (dmv) with 85% achiving gainful employment, 90% achieving independent living and 25% incorporating businesses. S2e's 4-phase approach includes the following services: crisis shelter: safe, short-term placements using month-long airbnb/vrbo rentals as a trauma-informed, cost-effective hotel alternative.- 1,243 instances of emergency shelter placement - 724 instances of crisis intervention, protection & safety planning- 1,497 instances of substance use support and referralsemployment: supported employment with wage subsidies, job coaching and employment-first technical training at vetted small business worksites 100% (months 13), 50% (46), 25% (79).- 8,715 instances of supported employment- 3,499 instances of interventions with employers, creditors, landlords and academic institutionshousing stability: 12-month housing advocacy and phased rent support to stabilize survivors 100% (months 13), 75% (46), 50% (79), 25% (1012).- 3,189 shelter/housing services- 447 rental assistance paymentsself-employment: mentorship with small business owners; practical skills (e.g., quickbooks, social media marketing), certifications, and an "employment-first" path toward entrepreneurship. Other survivor care services: 4,900 case management hours, 650 individual therapy/mental health sessions, 538 holistic care therapy (e.g. Art/alternative, etc)
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 68% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 85
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 18
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 89.3%; rating input score 89
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -18.1%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.09; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 28.4%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 26.2% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 24% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 33.9% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 8 programs and campaigns described on the official site
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 89.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $77K · 17 people listed
- Consistency: 24 of 24 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 10/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 4/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 8/100.