Survey Action Center
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 311776884
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2012–2013
- Forms available
- Form 990 2011, Form 990-EZ 2013
- Location
- Harpswell, ME, USA
- Phone
- 2022517777
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Arms Control, Peace
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $0
- Expenses
- $24,763
- Assets
- $40,904
- Liabilities
- $204,281
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Gail Pressberg (President)
- Robert Eaton (Executive Director)
People named in this filing
- David Chatfield (Sec/Treasurer)
- Gail Pressberg (President)
- Robert Levering (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
We envision a world free from the impact of landmines. We seek a world where resources are made available to post conflict societies on the basis of humane, moral, and intellectual rigorous information gathering that comes directly from affected communities. Our vision is best advanced through creative partnerships with national authorities, NGOs, UN agencies and donors.
What it reported doing in 2013
1 DATA INTEGRATION PROJECT The goal of this grant is to bring the mine action and development sectors together through identifying gaps in knowledge and understanding and increase the responsiveness of mine action to diverse national stakeholders by making data available to the development and service sector actors in a timely and appropriate format, and to ultimately increase the use of mine action in development planning.The major outcomes of this project are a greater understanding by mine-action planners of the ways development service providers use landmine information; greater understanding in the non-mine action sectors of their own valid need for mine action information to determine their priorities and program design; an inventory of non-mine action actors who potentially need mine action information for the success of their own work; identification of current practices in dealing with such actors with special attention for good practices developed in some countries that could be considered for adoption by others, and recommendations regarding information and tools that mine action authorities could proactively provide to other stakeholders to ensure the most beneficial impact on national development.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 20
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 25
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: 52.5%; rating input score 53
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.65; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 4.99; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -67.6% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -103.5% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 50.2% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 52.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $13K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2012 to 2013
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 53/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 2/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.