Supporting Kidds Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 611961292
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2022–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2020
- Location
- Hockessin, DE, USA
- Phone
- 3022355544
- Rating
- 69
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Housing, Shelter N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $668,097
- Expenses
- $534,651
- Assets
- $1,238,783
- Liabilities
- $193,446
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- LOUISE CUMMINGS (EXECUTIVE DI): $100,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To support children and family members that are grieving emotionally and mentally.
What it reported doing in 2024
Supporting kidds is the center for grieving children and their families, located in hockessin, Delaware. We provide grief support to children ages 5-18. Grief affects everyone at some point in their life. One of our goals is to create a community around death and dying so that children do not feel alone while they grieve. At our center we provide individual grief counseling and grief support groups, but we recognize that not all children can come to our center for support. Supporting kidds began offering grief support groups in schools, so we could support more children in the community and empower the community/school districts to support them in their grieving process. In 2024, supporting kidds facilitated 53 school-based grief support groups across 22 schools in new castle county and supported 284 students in their grief journeys. In 2024, supporting kidds also attended 23 community resource fairs, outreach events, and programs to increase the awareness of our programs in the community with the intention of linking programs to families. We saw approximately 7,068 people in the community therefore, increasing the community's awareness of our programs and gave out around 2,551 resource items. We are a small nonprofit that has made a big impact on the students in the schools and with the Delaware community surrounding grief and loss. At the supporting kidds center, we saw 56 clients for individual counseling, which totaled 761 sessions. The clinical director saw 89 caregivers for consults. For our events at the center, we held 22 groups, which served 163 children and 127 adults. Events that we held were: two rounds of healing pathways (our 6-week peer bereavement support group), memories for mom, a movie night, dad's day, family fun nights, a family art night, back to school night, coping with the holidays and our holiday happenings party to wrap up the year. Each group is designed for children and caregivers to meet others who have been through a similar loss to form connection and a sense of community around their grief. They do this through grief education, discussion and hands-on activities.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 61% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 43
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 79
- Sustainability: 62
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 42.4%; rating input score 42
- Program expense ratio: 53%; rating input score 53
- Fundraising efficiency: $5.98 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 20%; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.32; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.16; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 18.7%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 8.2% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 16.5% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.7% per year; rating input score 100; 28th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 42.4% of revenue deployed · 53% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 4 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $283K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $100K · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 42/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 53/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 22/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 16/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 35/100.