Sup Gurl

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
933503284
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Englewood, OH, USA
Phone
9372728203
Rating
88
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Fund Raising and/or Fund Distribution

Reported finances

Revenue
$15,588
Expenses
$14,832
Assets
$889
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Daniel Hoover (President)
  • Rachel George (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Daniel Hoover (President)
  • Rachel George (Vice President)
  • David Roustio (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Organized exclusively for charitable, educational, and supportive purposes, the primary mission being to support individuals struggling with alcoholism and addiction, as well as adults with developmental disabilities, and shall engage in sales of shirts, hats, jewelry, other merchandise, donations.

What it reported doing in 2025

Sup Gurl was supported mainly by the Founder and CEO within guidelines and some other donations online through PayPal Giving Fund. Products, services and creation of programs was the focus this year. Through planning and coordination with Provider Agencies in the State of Ohio, a Program has begun to emerge gathering those who are in recovery with adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities to create art together and get the surrounding community involved. It should be scheduled for its first pilot program in late summer 2025 provided the funding can be acquired.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 97
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 42
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 95.2%; rating input score 95
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 4.8%; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.06; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 88% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 21.3% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 130.5% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 95.2% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $15K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 10/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 53/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.