Sunshine Place Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 205398498
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-T 2023
- Location
- Sun Prairie, WI, USA
- Phone
- 6088253875
- Rating
- 87
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fund Raising and Fund Distribution
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $6,836,309
- Expenses
- $5,246,835
- Assets
- $7,809,860
- Liabilities
- $99,154
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
16 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ANN MAASTRICHT (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- ANN MAASTRICHT (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $100,154 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide comprehensive services that support essential needs through community engagement and partnerships.
What it reported doing in 2025
1. Food security the food pantry operates six days a week and is open to all Wisconsin residents. Guests may visit every two weeks, and home delivery is available for those with mobility or transportation challenges. The pantry provides nutritious food, including protein sources and dairy products, as well as personal hygiene items, laundry detergent, and feminine hygiene products. Additional food security programs include our food for kids program, support for school-based food pantries, thanksgiving baskets, and a free weekly meal. Guests can also access surplus food six days a week in our resource lobby. 2. Housing stability through our housing navigation program, case managers provide comprehensive support to households facing housing instability. This includes financial assistance to prevent eviction, as well as guidance, education, and advocacy to help families secure and maintain stable housing. Case managers work closely with families to identify affordable housing options, address barriers to securing a home, and develop long-term strategies to avoid eviction.our housing navigation team also conducts outreach and advocacy on issues related to housing, homelessness, and families living in doubled-up situations within the communities we serve. Additionally, we offer specialized housing case management for families with young children enrolled in the early childhood zone.3. Kids essentials programming our kids essentials programming ensures that children in need have access to basic necessities that support their well-being and development. This includes clothing, beds, school supplies, holiday gifts, and other essential items to help children thrive. By providing these resources, we help alleviate financial stress on families and create a stronger foundation for children to learn, grow, and succeed.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 96% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 83% of its reported program spending out as grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 75
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 68
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 69.7%; rating input score 70
- Program expense ratio: 90.3%; rating input score 90
- Fundraising efficiency: $20.14 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 23.3%; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.49; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 1.9%; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 28.3% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 23.2% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 13.2% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 69.7% of revenue deployed · 90.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $4.7M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $100K · 16 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $159K reported
- Consistency: 36 of 36 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 59/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 48/100.