Sunrise Haven

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
910856575
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Kent, WA, USA
Phone
2538132096
Rating
82
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Nursing, Convalescent Facilities
Affiliation
Christianity

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,425,912
Expenses
$1,708,919
Assets
$5,332,149
Liabilities
$128,627

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • EMMA FLAVIN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO NOV 15 2024)
  • RACHEL SCHUTZ (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FM NOV 2024)
  • MADELEINE WILEY (PRESIDENT)
  • LORI BEATTY (VICE PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • EMMA FLAVIN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO NOV 15 2024): $101,088 total reported compensation
  • RACHEL SCHUTZ (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FM NOV 2024): $14,578 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Christian science nursing-inspiring, loving, and healing humanity. Sunrise haven exists to provide an environment conducive to spiritual healing for the practice of christian science nursing as established in the church manual bylaw.

What it reported doing in 2024

Christian science nurses provide excellent skilled, physical nursing care for individuals relying solely on god for healing through the practice of christian science. Christian science nurses provide 24-hour inpatient care at sunrise haven, as well as outpatient services for immediate needs. Twenty-two (22) individuals were cared for during the 2025 fiscal year. In addition, sunrise haven offers a christian science nurses training program.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 96% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 67
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Accountability: 84
  • Sustainability: 76
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 59.5%; rating input score 59
  • Program expense ratio: 74.3%; rating input score 74
  • Fundraising efficiency: $73.49 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Fail
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 29.6%; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.12; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 6.8%; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 4.3% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 4.2% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 5% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 59.5% of revenue deployed · 74.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 4 of 4 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.3M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $101K · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 59/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 8 not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 43/100.